Originally Posted by
Shiny Lil Detlr
In what way are you defining that observation? The reason I ask is because while the SoftBuff 2.0 (closed cell) cutting pads are "stiff," I would call the original open cell SoftBuff cutting pad "stiffer" or "harder," at least where surface conformity over curved body panels is concerned...
I am saying that if you take the same formula of foam (compression/rebound identical) and make one as a closed cell and one as a open cell, the closed cell foam is going to be stiffer. Its like laying to pieces of steel side by side to form the frame of a car. If you attach them together with two cross members the `frame` will have a lot of flex. However if you run twelve cross members together it will be stiffer. A closed cell foam has more `support` and thus, all things being equal, will be stiffer and less resistant to change.
I agree 100% that the Softbuff pad is more aggressive/stiffer then the Softbuff 2.0 pad, but this is because a more aggressive foam is used, not because the foam is either open or closed.
Bookmarks